Primary Decision-Makers (must interview):
| Segment | Who | Why | Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Operators | Centre directors, principals, owners | End buyer + daily user. Pain is real — safety incidents, staffing, parent complaints | ECDA centre directory, LinkedIn, cold outreach |
| Chain Management | Regional managers, CTO, Head of Operations at preschool chains (e.g., MindChamps, PCF Sparkletots, EtonHouse, Busy Bees) | Multi-site decision makers, budget authority, scaling need | LinkedIn, ARISE network, SUTD alumni |
| Childcare Consultants | APTled (existing partner), ECDA advisors, early childhood consultants | Influencers who shape buying decisions for multiple centres | APTled partnership, LinkedIn |
| Regulatory/Compliance | ECDA officers, preschool licensing officers | Understand compliance drivers, future mandates, what centres struggle with most | SUTD connection, direct email |
| ICT/System Integrators | IT vendors serving childcare centres (CCTV installers, POS providers) | Channel partners, understand current infrastructure landscape | Google Maps + “CCTV installation Singapore” |
Interview Mix Recommendation: - 3–4 Centre Operators (individual centres) - 2–3 Chain Management (corporate level) - 1–2 Consultants/Advisors - 1–2 System Integrators/ICT vendors
Not required for May 13 homework. Can be done later for HW2.
Planned segments for later: - Parents (15–20) — FB groups: SG Mummies, KiasuParents - Educators/Teachers (8–10) — LinkedIn, teacher forums - Guardians (5–8) — Grandparents/helpers via parent network
Opening & Rapport (5 min)
“Hi, I’m Jevin, a pharmacist and researcher. My team is investigating how childcare centres currently handle safety monitoring — things like incidents, falls, rough handling, and how centres track and report these. We’re not selling anything — we’re just trying to understand the real problems centres face.”
Problem Probe (15 min)
Incidents & Safety: 4. “What types of safety incidents happen most frequently at your centre? (e.g., falls, rough handling, altercations between children, unauthorised access)” 5. “How do you currently detect safety incidents? Walk me through the last time an incident happened — how was it discovered?” 6. “How often do incidents go unnoticed until a parent or child reports them?” 7. “What’s your current process for documenting and reporting incidents? How long does it take?”
Monitoring & CCTV: 8. “What CCTV system do you currently use? (brand, number of cameras, recording method)” 9. “Who monitors the CCTV feeds? How often? Is it live or review-after-the-fact?” 10. “What’s the biggest frustration with your current CCTV setup?”
Staffing & Compliance: 11. “How many staff do you have supervising children at any time? What’s the ideal ratio?” 12. “How much time does your team spend on incident documentation per week?” 13. “How do you handle parent complaints about safety? How often do these come in?” 14. “What does ECDA compliance look like for CCTV? What do centres struggle with most?”
Pain Quantification: 15. “If you could fix ONE thing about how your centre handles safety monitoring, what would it be?” 16. “What’s the cost of a missed incident — in terms of parent complaints, staff time, regulatory issues?” 17. “Have there been any near-misses or serious incidents that kept you up at night?”
Magic Wand (3 min)
“If you had a magic wand and could design the perfect safety monitoring system for your centre — what would it do?”
Solution Reveal (5 min)
“Based on what centres like yours have told us, we’re developing an AI system that works with your existing CCTV cameras to automatically detect safety incidents — falls, rough handling, altercations — in real-time. It generates incident reports and lets you search video footage using natural language, like ‘show me all incidents in the toddler room last week.’ Everything runs on-site at your centre — no data goes to the cloud.”
Feature Reaction (5 min): 20. “How useful would automatic incident detection be for your centre? On a scale of 1–10?” 21. “What about automatic incident report generation — how much time would that save?” 22. “The system runs on-premise at your centre, not in the cloud. How important is on-site data privacy to you? Would parents care?” 23. “What features would you need to see before considering something like this?”
Buying Intent (5 min): 24. “If this were available today at a price that works for your centre’s budget, would you consider adopting it?” 25. “What would you be willing to pay per month for a system like this?” 26. “Who else in your organisation would need to approve this decision?” 27. “Would you be willing to pilot this at your centre if we offered it for free?”
Competitive Landscape: 28. “Are you currently using or evaluating any other AI or smart monitoring tools?” 29. “Have you considered solutions like Verkada, Rhombus, or WatchMeGrow? Why or why not?” 30. “What would make you switch from your current setup to a new system?”
Parents: 31. “How do you currently stay informed about your child’s safety at childcare?” 32. “Has there ever been an incident at your child’s centre that concerned you? How did you find out?” 33. “Would you feel more comfortable if your child’s centre had AI-powered incident detection? Why or why not?” 34. “Would you be willing to pay more in fees for a centre that uses AI safety monitoring?” 35. “What are your biggest concerns about CCTV in childcare centres?” (privacy vs. safety tradeoff) 36. “If you could check on your child during the day via a secure video feed, would you use it? How often?”
Educators/Teachers: 37. “How do you currently handle incident reporting? How long does it take per incident?” 38. “Have you ever witnessed an incident that wasn’t caught by staff? What happened?” 39. “Would AI-powered incident detection make your job easier or harder? Why?” 40. “What concerns would you have about being monitored by AI while you work?” 41. “If the system could auto-generate incident reports, how much time would that save you per week?”
| # | Field | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Date & Time | Tracking cadence |
| 2 | Interviewee Name | For persona slides |
| 3 | Organisation / Centre Name | Segment classification |
| 4 | Role / Title | Decision-making power |
| 5 | Segment | B2B Operator / Chain / Consultant / Regulator / Parent / Educator |
| 6 | Years in childcare | Experience level correlates with insight quality |
| 7 | Centre size (children, staff count) | Revenue potential proxy |
| 8 | Current CCTV setup | Competitor/integration intel |
| 9 | Top 3 pain points (verbatim) | Assumption validation |
| 10 | Magic Wand answer (verbatim quote) | Value proposition input |
| 11 | Problem severity (1–10 rating if asked) | Prioritisation |
| 12 | Current workaround | Competitive gap analysis |
| 13 | Time spent on incidents (weekly hrs) | ROI quantification |
| 14 | Awareness of alternatives | Competitive landscape |
| 15 | Willingness to adopt (Yes / Maybe / No) | Sales pipeline signal |
| 16 | Price sensitivity (what they’d pay) | Pricing model validation |
| 17 | Decision-making unit | B2B sales strategy |
| 18 | Referrals offered | Snowball sampling |
| 19 | Key insight / surprise | Insight development |
| 20 | Assumption: Validated / Partially / Invalidated | Assumption canvas update |
After each interview, update:
| Assumption Category | Our Assumption | Interview Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Identification | Centre operators are the primary buyer | “Our IT director handles all camera decisions” | ⬜ |
| Customer Problem | Centres miss safety incidents due to manual monitoring | “We had a fall last month nobody saw for 30 minutes” | ⬜ |
| Solution Attractiveness | AI auto-detection would save 5+ hrs/week on reporting | “That would cut my admin time in half” | ⬜ |
| Competing Offers | Centres use basic CCTV, no AI analytics | “We looked at Verkada but it was too expensive” | ⬜ |
| Technology | On-premise is preferred for PDPA compliance | “Parents are very sensitive about cloud data” | ⬜ |
| Price/Performance | $250/mo is acceptable for SG premium centres | “We’d pay $200–300 if it really works” | ⬜ |
| Deadline | B2B Done | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Now (May 7) | 0 | — |
| Target by May 13 | 10 | 10 B2B interviews |
| Rate needed | ~2/day | Manageable |
Focus: 10 B2B only for May 13 homework. B2C interviews can be done later for HW2 (June 3) if needed.
Prioritised outreach order: Centre operators → Chain management → Consultants → System integrators