Computer vision that helps CCTV spot safety incidents as they happen
Investor Deck | May 2026
1st Place, Healthcare Track — AI Singapore Pan-SEA AI Developer Challenge 2025
2026
2026
Works with the cameras centres already have
2026
Childcare safety AI monitoring
21–31% CAGR by 2030
Our Niche
11–21% CAGR by 2030
~5–10% of total AI surveillance by 2030
2026
~$36M/year recurring AMC beachhead
2026
| Pricing | Deployment | Childcare AI | COGS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIMIS.AI | Per-site ✓ | On-premise ✓ | Childcare AI ✓ | <$500 |
| Verkada | Per-camera ✗ | Cloud ✗ | Generic ✗ | $600–3,500 |
| Rhombus | Per-camera ✗ | Cloud ✗ | Generic ✗ | $200–1,648 |
| WatchMeGrow | Per-site ✓ | Cloud ✗ | Streaming only ✗ | Custom |
2026
Model validation with bounding boxes and confidence scoring
Every deployed centre generates labelled data → improves model → attracts more centres
2026
Full-featured premium tier for Singapore's regulated market
3yr LTV
$10,500
Anchor offer — highest margin
Mid-tier for Malaysia — competitive pricing with strong value
3yr LTV
$7,280
Regional expansion
Affordable entry tier for emerging ASEAN markets
3yr LTV
$4,820
Mass-market volume play
70–84% install · ~95% AMC | Software = 78–88% of revenue
2026
3-Year Cumulative: ~$2.6M | Company break-even: ~100–120 centres (Year 2)
2026
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $240K | $645K | $1,700K |
| COGS | $19.5K | $43.4K | $96.2K |
| Gross Profit | $220.5K | $601.6K | $1,603.8K |
| Gross Margin | 91.9% | 93.3% | 94.3% |
| Operating Expenses | $256K | $352K | $679K |
| EBITDA | –$35.5K | +$249.6K | +$924.8K |
Product gross margin: 92–95%. Losses are R&D investment, not business model.
2026
Core constraint: CCTV captures everything, understands nothing
Safety incidents discovered too late — after harm has occurred
Parent complaints & trust erosion
Staff accountability gaps
ECDA/MSF compliance risk
Incidents found avg 2–3 days later — only through manual review or parent reports
Generic CCTV analytics too noisy; cloud AI blocked by PDPA concerns
CCTV = passive recording, no active intelligence layer
Framework: Theory of Constraints (Goldratt) — 3 operator interviews confirmed all UDEs
2026
Injection: On-premise edge AI turns passive CCTV into active safety intelligence
Proactive safety monitoring replaces reactive incident discovery
Incidents caught in minutes
Response: hours → minutesAccountability via objective records
Records: manual → auto time-stampedFranchisor multi-site view
Oversight: site-by-site → centralisedParents trust the system
Trust: complaints → confidenceReal-time CV detection + instant alerts
Auto incident reports + searchable footage
PDPA compliance by design
On-premise edge AI device connects to existing CCTV
Childcare-specific CV models + privacy-first architecture
Before
Reactive
After
Proactive
Framework: Theory of Constraints (Goldratt)
Negative branches pruned: teacher surveillance concern, alert fatigue, hardware cost barrier, parent livestream demand
2026
2026
Shenzhen co-founder gives us a hardware cost advantage
Each centre adds labelled examples, making the model harder to copy
Singapore's childcare CCTV mandate gives us a clear first market
Circular economy — hardware refresh and trade-in creates recurring revenue lock-in
$150K–300K funds 12 months to prove the wedge in a ~$94M pricing SAM
SIMIS.AI — A Trained Pair of Eyes for Every Camera
2026